Most tender tools help with one piece. TenderIQ takes you the whole way — from ITT to submission.
Built for Irish and UK public procurement — from etenders notices to MEAT tender responses. Upload your ITT, employer's requirements and bills of quantities; get a project overview, criteria framework, clarification queries, response brief, a drafted answer for every query, an evaluator-grade score, your competitive position and a final pack check — one tool, from the day the ITT lands to the hour before you submit. And it marks the way the evaluation panel will, not the way you'd like: in the actual bands, against the actual criteria, grounded in your own evidence. Weeks of bid writing and thousands in consultant fees — done in an afternoon, and told to you straight.
TenderIQ scores any tender marked on MEAT criteria: construction works under the Capital Works Management Framework, facilities management and services, supply of goods, and green and energy contracts. Each sector has its own lens, standards and scoring discipline. Whether you bid every month or twice a year, TenderIQ turns the hardest, most expensive part of winning work into the easiest.
Works tenders under the Capital Works Management Framework — methodology, programme, resourcing, PW-CF contract mechanics.
Total FM, cleaning, security and hard-services contracts — mobilisation, SFG20, SLAs and method.
Medical, ICT, equipment and framework supplies — conformance, whole-life cost, delivery and compliance.
Retrofit, EPC and renewables — carbon, IPMVP measurement and verification, energy performance and sustainability criteria.
Rarely because the work isn't good enough. Usually because the response leaves marks on the table — and no one catches it until the result comes back.
The response talks around the criterion instead of addressing exactly what it asks.
A reusable method that isn't tied to this project, this site, this contract.
Claims without the named examples, data or references a panel can award marks for.
Strong content that breaches format rules and gets discounted or disqualified.
Submitting a price with no sense of where the response stands on quality.
Discovering the weaknesses in the debrief letter, when nothing can be changed.
Each stage feeds the next, so nothing is re-keyed and nothing is lost between the tender documents and the pack you submit.
Upload the ITT, the employer's requirements, drawings, programmes, the bill of quantities — PDF, Word, Excel and images, filed by category. TenderIQ reads them and hands you a project overview: what the job is, the key dates, the constraints, each fact traced back to the document it came from.
For each award criterion, TenderIQ shows you what the evaluator is really asking — the concern behind the question and what a top-band answer has to cover — read straight from the tender itself.
Where the documents are silent, contradictory or ambiguous, TenderIQ drafts the clarification questions worth putting to the contracting authority — before the query deadline closes, not after.
A full first draft of each answer, grounded in your project documents and built the way that sector's evaluators mark. Download it as an editable Word document with every evidence gap marked, so your team can finish it and own it.
Paste your finished response back and TenderIQ marks it the way the evaluator will — in the actual bands, against the actual criteria, with the quality-versus-price competitiveness read. Not a flattering number. The honest one, while you can still do something about it.
A final pass across the whole submission: unanswered requirements, placeholders left in the text, and answers that contradict each other from one criterion to the next.
The only tool that takes you the whole way — read, questioned, drafted, marked, and checked.
Every other tool tells you your bid is great. Your bid isn't great until the evaluator says so — and by then it's too late to change it. TenderIQ scores the way the panel scores: it counts reservations, it won't be flattered by good writing, and it never invents evidence you don't have. It tells you the truth about your bid while you can still act on it. That's the whole point.
TenderIQ isn't one general model given a clever instruction. It's a register of individually trained skills — each one taught a single discipline of tender work, each one applied at the point in the process where it matters. Eight run the pipeline from intake to final check. Eight more are the specialist lenses a panel marks against.
Each skill is versioned and governed by a written specification — so the same submission is read the same way today, next month and next year.
A single quality submission can take weeks of work and €5,000–€10,000 in time and fees. TenderIQ compresses the reading, the breakdown, the drafting and the review into one afternoon — for less than the cost of a single submission a month. Win one more tender a year, and it has paid for itself many times over.
Most Irish MEAT tenders score quality relative to the best submission — which no tool can see. So Tender IQ scores what you control, and lets you model the rest.
The marks your response earns on each criterion, against the rubric. Locked — the only way to move it is to improve the response.
You set where the strongest competing response likely lands, and your price versus the lowest. Your call, your knowledge of the market.
Quality scored relative to the best tender, plus your price — combined into an indicative total that updates as you improve.
We never claim to predict who wins. There's no fabricated win probability and no invented ranking — because we can't see your competitors' bids, and we won't pretend to.
TenderIQ is launching with a founding group of contractors and suppliers. Because it scores consistently, the improvement is measurable — here's the kind of lift the coaching produces. (Illustrative founding-cohort examples.)
"It caught a whole criterion we'd half-answered. The rewrite guidance took our Programme section from a pass to genuinely strong."
"The value is seeing where you lose marks before the panel does. We stopped guessing and started fixing the right things."
"Consistent scoring meant I could trust the before/after. I could show the team exactly why a section improved."
Per-criterion scoring with the exact gaps quoted from your own response.
The engine reads your project first, so it judges the response in context.
Every response downloads as an editable Word document, with the evidence you still need clearly marked.
Cross-criteria checks catch answers that clash with each other before a panel spots it.
A library and evidence vault so your strongest past outcomes are always to hand.
The owner invites colleagues by email; everyone works from the same tender, drafts and evidence.
TenderIQ does not write your bid. You finish it and own it. What it does is draft every answer from your documents and hands it to you as an editable Word file, with every place you need your own evidence clearly marked. It never invents evidence — where it needs a real fact, a past project or a figure, it tells you to add it.
PDFs, Word documents, Excel workbooks and images — the ITT, employer's requirements, specifications, drawings, programmes, bills of quantities and reports, filed by category. Up to 50 files per tender, 100 MB per file. CAD files are stored but read best when exported to PDF.
Yes. Where the documents are silent, contradictory or ambiguous, it drafts the clarification questions worth putting to the contracting authority, grouped by criterion, so you can lodge them before the query deadline.
It marks in the evaluator's bands, counting reservations the way a panel does, and shows the quality-versus-price competitiveness read. It won't flatter you — that's the point.
It looks at the finished pack for unanswered requirements, placeholders still left in the text, and answers that contradict each other across criteria. It doesn't judge compliance, quality or price — that's what the scoring is for.
Your documents and responses stay yours. Full stop. They're private to your organisation, encrypted, and never used to train shared models.
Irish public-sector MEAT tenders. Construction under the Capital Works Management Framework is where it's tuned hardest, and it also supports goods, facilities management and energy tenders.
No. It explains the project and the questions in plain terms, and shows you where the marks are.
Yes — the plan includes unlimited team members. The account owner invites colleagues by email and they join the same organisation, working from the same tenders, drafts and evidence.
14 days free, then €299/month, unlimited under fair use. A credit card is required to start the trial and you're charged on day 15 unless you cancel. Cancel any time in two clicks — that stops all future payments and you keep access until the end of the month you've paid for. Payments already taken aren't refunded, which is exactly why the first 14 days are free.
Try it free for 14 days. Upload a tender and see everything TenderIQ does — the overview, the breakdown, the draft, the score. Card required to start; cancel any time before day 15 and you pay nothing.
Start your 14-day free trial